PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. LRCU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 314.98% return.


VEA

1D
1.17%
1M
4.79%
YTD
16.08%
6M
17.35%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
10.67%

LRCU

1D
12.70%
1M
77.20%
YTD
314.98%
6M
346.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
16.08%8.54%
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
314.98%172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and LRCU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEALRCUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.96

VEA vs. LRCU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and LRCU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEALRCUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-40.09%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-9.29%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

Volatility

VEA vs. LRCU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEALRCUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

114.38%

-97.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

114.38%

-97.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

114.38%

-96.97%

VEA vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEA vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.59%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and LRCU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 1.30% for LRCU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and LRCU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer