VEA vs. LRCU
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. VEA is passively managed, while LRCU is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.
Performance
VEA vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 314.98% return.
VEA
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 6M
- 17.35%
- 1Y
- 32.96%
- 3Y*
- 19.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
LRCU
- 1D
- 12.70%
- 1M
- 77.20%
- YTD
- 314.98%
- 6M
- 346.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEA vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 16.08% | 8.54% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 314.98% | 172.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and LRCU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VEA vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEA | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEA vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and LRCU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -40.09% | -20.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.27% | -9.29% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | — | — |
Volatility
VEA vs. LRCU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 114.38% | -97.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 114.38% | -97.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 114.38% | -96.97% |
VEA vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEA vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.59% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and LRCU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 1.30% for LRCU.
Find the right allocation for VEA and LRCU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer