VEA vs. IXN
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.72%/yr vs 25.03%/yr for IXN. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXN.
Performance
VEA vs. IXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than IXN's 33.08% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed IXN with an annualized return of 10.72%, while IXN has yielded a comparatively higher 25.03% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
IXN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 33.08%
- 6M
- 35.17%
- 1Y
- 62.93%
- 3Y*
- 32.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 25.03%
VEA vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.73% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 33.08% | 25.25% | 24.84% | 52.98% | -29.86% | 29.58% | 43.62% | 47.88% | -5.44% | 41.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and IXN is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.76 |
The correlation between VEA and IXN shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VEA vs. IXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
IXN
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEA
IXN
-
Industrials
VEA
IXN
Technology
VEA
IXN
Healthcare
VEA
IXN
Basic Materials
VEA
IXN
-
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
IXN
-
Consumer Defensive
VEA
IXN
-
Energy
VEA
IXN
Communication Services
VEA
IXN
-
Utilities
VEA
IXN
-
Real Estate
VEA
IXN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
IXN
VEA vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEA | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 4.39 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 14.35 | -4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEA vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than IXN's maximum drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and IXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -55.67% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -13.80% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -25.55% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -36.30% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -36.30% | +0.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -6.68% | +5.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.28% | -11.26% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 4.21% | -1.19% |
Volatility
VEA vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 6.84%, while iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 12.01% | -5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 20.45% | -6.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 24.03% | -7.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 25.19% | -8.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 24.58% | -7.18% |
VEA vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEA vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than IXN's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.78% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and IXN have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXN has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to VEA (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs IXN's -55.67%.
On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 25.03% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 25.03% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.78% for IXN.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IXN is Technology Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.46% for IXN.
IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and IXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer