PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. HAWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. HAWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.71% return, which is significantly lower than HAWX's 17.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed HAWX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while HAWX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


VEA

1D
1.25%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
14.71%
6M
14.32%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
11.09%

HAWX

1D
0.85%
1M
1.78%
YTD
17.15%
6M
17.23%
1Y
36.02%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. HAWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.71%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
17.15%26.24%14.88%17.05%-8.59%13.40%6.92%22.75%-9.77%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and HAWX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.81

The correlation between VEA and HAWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEA vs. HAWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
HAWX

Financial Services

22.3%
23.2%

Industrials

17.5%
14.2%

Technology

16.6%
22.5%

Healthcare

7.6%
6.8%

Basic Materials

7.5%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.8%

Energy

4.7%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.9%

Utilities

3.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.4%

Financial Services

VEA
22.3%
HAWX
23.2%

Industrials

VEA
17.5%
HAWX
14.2%

Technology

VEA
16.6%
HAWX
22.5%

Healthcare

VEA
7.6%
HAWX
6.8%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
HAWX
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.4%
HAWX
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.5%
HAWX
4.8%

Energy

VEA
4.7%
HAWX
4.8%

Communication Services

VEA
3.2%
HAWX
4.9%

Utilities

VEA
3.0%
HAWX
3.0%

Real Estate

VEA
2.5%
HAWX
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. HAWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HAWX
HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. HAWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEAHAWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.48

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.85

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

15.83

-5.53

VEA vs. HAWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the HAWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and HAWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. HAWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than HAWX's maximum drawdown of -30.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and HAWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAHAWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-30.63%

-30.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-9.39%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-13.30%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-17.47%

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-30.63%

-5.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-2.10%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-4.27%

-8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.28%

+0.74%

Volatility

VEA vs. HAWX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) at 6.52%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAHAWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

6.52%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

12.61%

+2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

14.26%

+2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

13.60%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

15.27%

+1.93%

VEA vs. HAWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than HAWX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEA vs. HAWX - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than HAWX's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.39%2.80%3.31%2.95%16.94%2.63%2.00%3.23%2.51%2.40%2.49%3.86%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.55%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VEA and HAWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to HAWX (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs HAWX's -30.63%.

On 10-year performance, HAWX leads with 12.59% vs 11.09% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HAWX has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HAWX.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.39% for HAWX.

VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.35% for HAWX.

HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and HAWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer