VEA vs. FLDR
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while FLDR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VEA returned 9.09%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for FLDR. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLDR.
Performance
VEA vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than FLDR's 1.37% return.
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
FLDR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
VEA vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.89% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.37% | 5.41% | 5.71% | 6.32% | -0.33% | -0.18% | 2.01% | 4.52% | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and FLDR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, VEA and FLDR have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
FLDR
VEA vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEA | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 2.70 | -1.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 10.04 | -7.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 68.61 | -59.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEA | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 5.83 | -4.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 3.05 | -2.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.61 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
VEA vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and FLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -12.23% | -48.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -0.47% | -11.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -0.76% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -2.33% | -27.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -0.08% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -0.35% | -12.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 0.07% | +2.93% |
Volatility
VEA vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.19%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 0.19% | +5.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 0.59% | +13.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 0.81% | +15.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 1.21% | +15.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 5.26% | +12.14% |
VEA vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEA vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than FLDR's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.43% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and FLDR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs FLDR's -12.23%.
On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.09% vs 3.67% for FLDR. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.09% return vs 3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.
FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 2.69% for VEA.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FLDR is Corporate Bonds. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.15% for FLDR.
FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and FLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer