PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. EFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. EFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.92% return, which is significantly higher than EFV's 9.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEA having a 10.17% annualized return and EFV not far behind at 9.75%.


VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%

EFV

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.13%
6M
12.94%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
9.13%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and EFV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.97

The correlation between VEA and EFV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
EFV

Financial Services

23.3%
36.9%

Industrials

19.2%
10.2%

Technology

13.8%
4.3%

Healthcare

8.2%
7.2%

Basic Materials

7.5%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
8.3%

Energy

5.4%
7.0%

Communication Services

3.4%
4.4%

Utilities

3.3%
5.9%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.5%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
EFV
36.9%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
EFV
10.2%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
EFV
4.3%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
EFV
7.2%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
EFV
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
EFV
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
EFV
8.3%

Energy

VEA
5.4%
EFV
7.0%

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
EFV
4.4%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
EFV
5.9%

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
EFV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEAEFVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

1.97

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

2.73

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.57

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.94

9.57

+1.37

VEA vs. EFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the EFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and EFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEAEFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.97

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.76

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.55

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.27

-0.02

Drawdowns

VEA vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum EFV drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and EFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAEFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-63.94%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-10.90%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-13.72%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-25.84%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-43.16%

+7.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-2.51%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-14.83%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.91%

+0.07%

Volatility

VEA vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) at 4.52%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAEFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

4.52%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

11.56%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

14.21%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

15.96%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

17.86%

-0.50%

VEA vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EFV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEA vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than EFV's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.81%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VEA and EFV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to EFV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs EFV's -63.94%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.17% vs 9.75% for EFV. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.39% for EFV.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and EFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer