VEA vs. AMLP
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.53%/yr vs 6.85%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.
Performance
VEA vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 15.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 10.53%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.85% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 3.63%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 15.67%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- 19.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- 15.69%
- 6M
- 14.93%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.34%
- 10Y*
- 6.85%
VEA vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.35% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 15.69% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and AMLP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VEA and AMLP has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VEA vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
AMLP
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VEA
AMLP
-
Industrials
VEA
AMLP
-
Technology
VEA
AMLP
-
Healthcare
VEA
AMLP
-
Basic Materials
VEA
AMLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
AMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
VEA
AMLP
-
Energy
VEA
AMLP
Communication Services
VEA
AMLP
-
Utilities
VEA
AMLP
Real Estate
VEA
AMLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
AMLP
VEA vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEA | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 1.78 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 5.78 | +4.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEA vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -77.19% | +16.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -8.94% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -14.27% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -20.92% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -72.62% | +36.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -4.61% | +3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.28% | -17.38% | +4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.75% | +0.27% |
Volatility
VEA vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 4.71%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 4.71% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 8.76% | +5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 11.84% | +4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 19.95% | -3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 27.67% | -10.26% |
VEA vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEA vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than AMLP's 7.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.68% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.63% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and AMLP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.53% vs 6.85% for AMLP. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 6.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.68%, compared with 2.63% for VEA.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AMLP is MLPs. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.90% for AMLP.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer