PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VDI vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VDI vs. DBAW

Last updated Aug 1, 2026
Documentation

VDI (Virtus International Dividend ETF) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. VDI is actively managed, while DBAW is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VDI charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.

Performance

VDI vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus International Dividend ETF (VDI) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDI achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than DBAW's 15.22% return.

VDI

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.41%
6M
10.60%
YTD
17.52%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

DBAW

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.63%
6M
10.49%
YTD
15.22%
1Y
31.59%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
11.19%
ALL TIME*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

DBAW

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
$1.29M$1.79M$1.16M

VDI

Virtus International Dividend ETF
$85.19K$45.68K$18.02K

VDI vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
VDI
Virtus International Dividend ETF		17.52%3.29%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF		15.22%2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VDI and DBAW is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.81

VDI vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VDI
DBAW

Financial Services

35.7%
23.9%

Industrials

12.9%
13.9%

Technology

10.2%
23.5%

Energy

8.2%
4.4%

Utilities

6.1%
3.0%

Basic Materials

5.6%
6.3%

Healthcare

4.8%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.0%

Communication Services

1.9%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
7.1%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.3%

Financial Services

VDI
35.7%
DBAW
23.9%

Industrials

VDI
12.9%
DBAW
13.9%

Technology

VDI
10.2%
DBAW
23.5%

Energy

VDI
8.2%
DBAW
4.4%

Utilities

VDI
6.1%
DBAW
3.0%

Basic Materials

VDI
5.6%
DBAW
6.3%

Healthcare

VDI
4.8%
DBAW
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

VDI
4.4%
DBAW
5.0%

Communication Services

VDI
1.9%
DBAW
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VDI
1.8%
DBAW
7.1%

Real Estate

VDI
1.3%
DBAW
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Virtus International Dividend ETF

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF

Often compared with VDI:
VDI vs. VUSVDI vs. KMIDVDI vs. SEIXVDI vs. VSHYVDI vs. ASMFVDI vs. NFLTVDI vs. VEU
Often compared with DBAW:
DBAW vs. HAWXDBAW vs. HFXIDBAW vs. GSIEDBAW vs. MDIJXDBAW vs. BROIXDBAW vs. DXJDBAW vs. BKIE

Return for Risk

VDI vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
VDI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VDI vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus International Dividend ETF (VDI) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VDIDBAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

2.05

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.81

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.39

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

3.35

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

12.36

—

VDI vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDI vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDI drawdown since its inception was -10.40%, smaller than the maximum DBAW drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDI and DBAW.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VDIDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-31.44%

+21.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-9.00%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-14.11%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-17.87%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-31.44%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-3.47%

+3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-4.97%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

2.44%

—

Volatility

VDI vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VDIDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

4.83%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

12.96%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

14.70%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

14.04%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

15.22%

+1.08%

VDI vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDI has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

VDI vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

VDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than DBAW's 1.70% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF		1.70%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
VDI
Virtus International Dividend ETF		2.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

VDI and DBAW have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDI is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDI is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

VDI has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.70% for DBAW.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VDI and 0.41% for DBAW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDI and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer