VDC vs. XLPP.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L).

VDC and XLPP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VDC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. XLPP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both VDC and XLPP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

VDC vs. XLPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VDC vs. XLPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF	6.50%	2.17%	13.30%	2.38%	-1.79%	17.64%	10.86%	26.11%	-7.79%	11.85%
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF	6.13%	4.45%	14.06%	-0.70%	-0.46%	18.72%	8.70%	27.88%	-9.57%	11.96%

Different Trading Currencies

VDC is traded in USD, while XLPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly higher than XLPP.L's 6.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VDC having a 7.68% annualized return and XLPP.L not far behind at 7.56%.

VDC

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -6.62%
• YTD: 6.50%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: 7.55%
• 5Y*: 7.26%
• 10Y*: 7.68%

XLPP.L

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -7.43%
• YTD: 6.13%
• 6M: 7.15%
• 1Y: 4.82%
• 3Y*: 8.00%
• 5Y*: 7.86%
• 10Y*: 7.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. XLPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLPP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XLPP.L

Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF

VDC

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF

Return for Risk

VDC vs. XLPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC

VDC Risk / Return Rank: 20
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 18
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 20

XLPP.L

XLPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
XLPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
XLPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
XLPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XLPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XLPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. XLPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VDC	XLPP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	0.33	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	0.58	-0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.07	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	0.49	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.21	1.17	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VDC vs. XLPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is comparable to the XLPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and XLPP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VDC	XLPP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	0.33	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.59	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.55	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.61	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and XLPP.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VDC vs. XLPP.L - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while XLPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF	2.15%	2.26%	2.33%	2.65%	2.37%	2.14%	2.50%	2.44%	2.78%	2.52%	2.39%	2.55%
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

VDC vs. XLPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, which is greater than XLPP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and XLPP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VDC	XLPP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.24%	-18.86%	-15.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-7.98%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.55%	-13.72%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.31%	-18.86%	-6.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.87%	-6.73%	-1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-4.53%	+0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.76%	3.83%	-0.07%

Volatility

VDC vs. XLPP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 3.84%, while Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VDC	XLPP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	4.41%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.98%	10.21%	-1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.67%	14.42%	-0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.98%	13.25%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.58%	13.68%	+0.90%