VDC vs. VIS
VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDC returned 8.03%/yr vs 14.22%/yr for VIS. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
VDC vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 8.03%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.
VDC
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 8.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
VIS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
VDC vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 10.55% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 15.65% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDC and VIS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VDC and VIS has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VDC vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDC
VIS
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
VDC
VIS
-
Consumer Cyclical
VDC
VIS
Industrials
VDC
VIS
Basic Materials
VDC
VIS
Healthcare
VDC
VIS
Communication Services
VDC
-
VIS
Energy
VDC
-
VIS
Financial Services
VDC
-
VIS
Real Estate
VDC
-
VIS
Technology
VDC
-
VIS
Utilities
VDC
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDC vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
VDC
VIS
VDC vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDC | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 2.24 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 9.28 | -7.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDC vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDC | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.24% | -63.51% | +29.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -12.29% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | -20.80% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.55% | -22.96% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.31% | -42.42% | +17.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | -0.34% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -8.37% | +4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 2.97% | +1.60% |
Volatility
VDC vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.62%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDC | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 6.71% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 14.28% | -4.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 17.20% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 18.48% | -5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 20.48% | -5.82% |
VDC vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VDC and VIS have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VDC vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than VIS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.08% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDC and VIS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to VDC (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs VIS's -63.51%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.22% vs 8.03% for VDC. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC and VIS have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.88% for VIS.
VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VIS is Industrials Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDC and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer