PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 7.59%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


VDC

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
5.75%
6M
4.31%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
7.59%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
5.75%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and VGT is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.51

The correlation between VDC and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VDC vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDC
VGT

Consumer Defensive

97.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
0.1%

Industrials

0.3%
0.4%

Basic Materials

0.3%
0.0%

Healthcare

0.0%
0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

98.5%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

VDC
97.5%
VGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

VDC
1.8%
VGT
0.1%

Industrials

VDC
0.3%
VGT
0.4%

Basic Materials

VDC
0.3%
VGT
0.0%

Healthcare

VDC
0.0%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

VDC

-

VGT
0.5%

Energy

VDC

-

VGT
0.3%

Financial Services

VDC

-

VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

VDC

-

VGT

-

Technology

VDC

-

VGT
98.5%

Utilities

VDC

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDCVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.47

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

3.69

-3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

11.77

-11.49

VDC vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDCVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

2.95

-2.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.89

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

1.05

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.68

-0.02

Drawdowns

VDC vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-54.63%

+20.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-16.40%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-27.23%

+15.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-35.07%

+18.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

-35.07%

+9.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-1.48%

-7.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-7.95%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

5.13%

-0.64%

Volatility

VDC vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.09%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

6.39%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

16.07%

-6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

20.57%

-8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

25.18%

-12.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

24.60%

-9.96%

VDC vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VDC and VGT have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDC vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.17%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and VGT have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to VDC (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.78% vs 7.59% for VDC. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDC and VGT have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer