VDC vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. VDC is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, VDC returned 8.56% vs 47.83% for GSIB. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

VDC vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 13.98% return.

VDC

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 10.55%
• 6M: 8.59%
• 1Y: 8.56%
• 3Y*: 9.05%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 8.03%

GSIB

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 8.41%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 47.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF	10.55%	2.17%	13.30%	1.72%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	13.98%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and GSIB is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.20

The correlation between VDC and GSIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VDC vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VDC	GSIB
Consumer Defensive	97.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	-
Industrials	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	0.3%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VDC vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC

VDC Risk / Return Rank: 19
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 18
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 18

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 81
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VDC	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	2.59	-2.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	3.58	-2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.43	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	3.28	-2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	11.54	-9.94

VDC vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VDC vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	VDC	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.24%	-17.71%	-16.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-13.90%	+4.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.37%	0.00%	-4.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.73%	-2.05%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	3.94%	+0.63%

Volatility

VDC vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.62%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VDC	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	5.59%	-0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.02%	14.41%	-4.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57%	17.63%	-5.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.17%	18.51%	-5.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.66%	18.51%	-3.85%

VDC vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VDC vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than GSIB's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.67%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF	2.08%	2.26%	2.33%	2.65%	2.37%	2.14%	2.50%	2.44%	2.78%	2.52%	2.39%	2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VDC and GSIB in my portfolio?

VDC and GSIB have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VDC or GSIB?

GSIB has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to VDC (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, VDC or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 47.83% vs 8.56% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VDC or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 47.83% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VDC or GSIB?

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GSIB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VDC or GSIB?

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.67% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between VDC and GSIB?

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.35% for GSIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.