PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. CAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. CAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than CAG's -24.02% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has outperformed CAG with an annualized return of 7.59%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively lower -6.51% annualized return.


VDC

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
5.75%
6M
4.31%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
7.59%

CAG

1D
-2.18%
1M
-9.17%
YTD
-24.02%
6M
-23.36%
1Y
-39.73%
3Y*
-24.56%
5Y*
-16.05%
10Y*
-6.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. CAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
5.75%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
-24.02%-33.32%1.46%-22.82%17.52%-2.55%8.69%65.50%-41.99%-2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and CAG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.59

The correlation between VDC and CAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. CAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CAG
CAG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDCCAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.76

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

-1.02

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

-1.97

+2.25

VDC vs. CAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the CAG Sharpe Ratio of -1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and CAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDCCAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

-1.43

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

-0.69

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

-0.25

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.24

+0.42

Drawdowns

VDC vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum CAG drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and CAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCCAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-62.52%

+28.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-39.25%

+29.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-56.93%

+45.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-62.52%

+45.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

-62.52%

+37.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-62.52%

+54.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-15.74%

+12.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

20.74%

-16.25%

Volatility

VDC vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.09%, while Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCCAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

7.94%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

21.94%

-12.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

27.90%

-15.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

23.33%

-10.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

26.18%

-11.54%

Dividends

VDC vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than CAG's 11.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
11.13%8.09%5.05%4.75%3.32%3.44%2.52%2.48%3.98%2.19%29.36%2.37%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.17%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and CAG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAG has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to VDC (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs CAG's -62.52%.

VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and CAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer