VDC vs. CAG
VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) is Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VDC returned 7.59%/yr vs -6.51%/yr for CAG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
VDC vs. CAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than CAG's -24.02% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has outperformed CAG with an annualized return of 7.59%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively lower -6.51% annualized return.
VDC
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- 1Y
- 1.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
CAG
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -9.17%
- YTD
- -24.02%
- 6M
- -23.36%
- 1Y
- -39.73%
- 3Y*
- -24.56%
- 5Y*
- -16.05%
- 10Y*
- -6.51%
VDC vs. CAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 5.75% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -24.02% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 17.52% | -2.55% | 8.69% | 65.50% | -41.99% | -2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDC and CAG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.59 |
The correlation between VDC and CAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDC vs. CAG — Risk / Return Rank
VDC
CAG
VDC vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDC | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.76 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | -1.02 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | -1.97 | +2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDC | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | -1.43 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | -0.69 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | -0.25 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.24 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
VDC vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum CAG drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and CAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDC | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.24% | -62.52% | +28.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -39.25% | +29.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | -56.93% | +45.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.55% | -62.52% | +45.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.31% | -62.52% | +37.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.52% | -62.52% | +54.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -15.74% | +12.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 20.74% | -16.25% |
Volatility
VDC vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.09%, while Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDC | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 7.94% | -3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 21.94% | -12.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.36% | 27.90% | -15.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 23.33% | -10.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 26.18% | -11.54% |
Dividends
VDC vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison
VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than CAG's 11.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 11.13% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.17% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDC and CAG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAG has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to VDC (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs CAG's -62.52%.
VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDC and CAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer