VDAFX vs. VTMFX
VDAFX (VALIC Company I Dynamic Allocation Fund) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, VDAFX returned 7.26%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for VTMFX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VDAFX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTMFX.
Performance
VDAFX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with VDAFX at 4.50% and VTMFX at 4.50%. Over the past 10 years, VDAFX has underperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 7.26%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.63% annualized return.
VDAFX
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 3.50%
- 1Y
- 12.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.26%
VTMFX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 13.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
VDAFX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDAFX VALIC Company I Dynamic Allocation Fund | 4.50% | 7.87% | 12.77% | 13.23% | -16.05% | 10.25% | 11.15% | 20.27% | -10.50% | 20.24% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 4.50% | 11.28% | 12.17% | 15.55% | -12.69% | 13.10% | 13.31% | 18.01% | -1.40% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDAFX and VTMFX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2012 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VDAFX and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDAFX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
VDAFX
VTMFX
VDAFX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Dynamic Allocation Fund (VDAFX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDAFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.42 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.65 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | 12.34 | -2.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDAFX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDAFX drawdown since its inception was -22.10%, smaller than the maximum VTMFX drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDAFX and VTMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDAFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -28.49% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -5.38% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.22% | -10.61% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.52% | -17.40% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.10% | -21.87% | -0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -1.45% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -3.54% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 1.15% | +0.21% |
Volatility
VDAFX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison
VALIC Company I Dynamic Allocation Fund (VDAFX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.56%. This indicates that VDAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDAFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 2.56% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.54% | 5.22% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.17% | 6.49% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.69% | 8.57% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.87% | 9.14% | +1.73% |
VDAFX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDAFX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDAFX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison
VDAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than VTMFX's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDAFX VALIC Company I Dynamic Allocation Fund | 5.04% | 0.00% | 5.99% | 7.99% | 16.76% | 11.16% | 5.50% | 6.88% | 1.43% | 2.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 1.94% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 1.72% | 2.05% | 2.22% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VDAFX and VTMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VDAFX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to VTMFX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDAFX dropped -22.10% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.
VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDAFX and VTMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer