PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCSH vs. SLQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCSH vs. SLQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCSH achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than SLQD's 0.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VCSH having a 2.70% annualized return and SLQD not far behind at 2.66%.


VCSH

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.59%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
2.70%

SLQD

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.16%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCSH vs. SLQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.64%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%7.02%0.92%2.17%
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.84%6.27%4.94%5.98%-4.38%-0.61%4.76%6.09%1.09%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between VCSH and SLQD is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2013

0.77

The correlation between VCSH and SLQD shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.97 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCSH vs. SLQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SLQD
SLQD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCSH vs. SLQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCSHSLQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.62

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

4.22

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

19.08

-5.53

VCSH vs. SLQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the SLQD Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCSH and SLQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCSHSLQDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

3.02

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.04

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.85

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.85

+0.17

Drawdowns

VCSH vs. SLQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCSH drawdown since its inception was -12.86%, roughly equal to the maximum SLQD drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCSH and SLQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCSHSLQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-12.69%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-1.06%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

-1.06%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.48%

-7.63%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

-12.69%

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.13%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-0.87%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.23%

+0.11%

Volatility

VCSH vs. SLQD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) has a higher volatility of 0.57% compared to iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) at 0.46%. This indicates that VCSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCSHSLQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

0.46%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.38%

1.09%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88%

1.49%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

2.44%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

3.14%

+0.21%

VCSH vs. SLQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCSH has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SLQD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCSH vs. SLQD - Dividend Comparison

VCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than SLQD's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.32%4.15%3.71%2.99%2.00%1.67%2.34%2.89%2.55%1.98%1.81%1.43%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VCSH and SLQD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VCSH has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to SLQD (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCSH dropped -12.86% vs SLQD's -12.69%.

On 10-year performance, VCSH leads with 2.70% vs 2.66% for SLQD. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SLQD has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCSH has performed better with a 2.70% return vs 2.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SLQD.

VCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 4.32% for SLQD.

VCSH tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Index, while SLQD tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VCSH and 0.06% for SLQD.

SLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCSH and SLQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer