PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLQD vs. VFSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SLQD vs. VFSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares (VFSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SLQD vs. VFSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.29%6.27%4.94%5.98%-4.38%-0.61%4.76%6.09%1.09%2.12%
VFSTX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares
-0.40%6.75%4.98%6.06%-5.84%-0.70%5.16%5.75%0.87%2.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLQD achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than VFSTX's -0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SLQD has outperformed VFSTX with an annualized return of 2.68%, while VFSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.49% annualized return.


SLQD

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
0.29%
6M
1.48%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
2.68%

VFSTX

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
0.73%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SLQD vs. VFSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLQD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VFSTX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SLQD vs. VFSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLQD
SLQD Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VFSTX
VFSTX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VFSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VFSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLQD vs. VFSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares (VFSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLQDVFSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

1.90

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.70

3.11

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.42

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

2.90

+1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.76

11.78

+6.98

SLQD vs. VFSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLQD Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the VFSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLQD and VFSTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLQDVFSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.90

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.75

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

1.02

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.51

-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between SLQD and VFSTX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SLQD vs. VFSTX - Dividend Comparison

SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, which matches VFSTX's 4.20% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.22%4.15%3.71%2.99%2.00%1.67%2.34%2.89%2.55%1.98%1.81%1.43%
VFSTX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares
4.20%4.48%4.06%3.05%1.93%1.70%2.24%2.83%2.68%2.00%2.04%1.99%

Drawdowns

SLQD vs. VFSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, which is greater than VFSTX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and VFSTX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SLQDVFSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-9.35%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.06%

-1.71%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.63%

-9.35%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.69%

-9.35%

-3.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-1.42%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-1.12%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.42%

-0.16%

Volatility

SLQD vs. VFSTX - Volatility Comparison

iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares (VFSTX) have volatilities of 0.73% and 0.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SLQDVFSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.75%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

1.49%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92%

2.51%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

2.94%

-0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.14%

2.46%

+0.68%