PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCRB vs. IBTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCRB vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCRB achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM's -0.50% return.


VCRB

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.34%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBTM

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
2.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCRB vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
0.47%7.56%2.21%0.65%
IBTM
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF
-0.50%8.06%-0.14%0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between VCRB and IBTM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023

0.95

The correlation between VCRB and IBTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCRB vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCRB
VCRB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTM
IBTM Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IBTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCRB vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCRBIBTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.17

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.21

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

3.51

+2.88

VCRB vs. IBTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the IBTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCRB and IBTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCRBIBTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

0.96

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.20

+0.73

Drawdowns

VCRB vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRB and IBTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRBIBTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-13.60%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-3.26%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-2.38%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-4.82%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.12%

-0.24%

Volatility

VCRB vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) have volatilities of 1.18% and 1.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRBIBTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

1.20%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

2.75%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

4.09%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.74%

7.56%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

7.56%

-2.82%

VCRB vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCRB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCRB vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison

VCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than IBTM's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBTM
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF
3.95%3.87%3.96%3.39%1.38%
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
4.60%4.55%4.22%0.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VCRB and IBTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBTM has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to VCRB (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCRB dropped -4.59% vs IBTM's -13.60%.

On 1-year performance, VCRB leads with 5.60% vs 3.93% for IBTM. On fees, IBTM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VCRB has performed better with a 5.60% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VCRB.

VCRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 3.95% for IBTM.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCRB and 0.07% for IBTM.

VCRB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCRB and IBTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer