PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTM vs. IBTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTM vs. IBTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IBTM having a -0.61% return and IBTO slightly lower at -0.64%.


IBTM

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.33%
YTD
-0.61%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
2.71%
5Y*
10Y*

IBTO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTM vs. IBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBTM
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF
-0.61%8.06%-0.14%0.77%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
-0.64%8.23%-0.87%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTM and IBTO is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.99

The correlation between IBTM and IBTO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTM vs. IBTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTM
IBTM Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IBTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTO
IBTO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IBTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTM vs. IBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTMIBTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

0.89

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

2.36

+0.15

IBTM vs. IBTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the IBTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTM and IBTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTM vs. IBTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTM drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, which is greater than IBTO's maximum drawdown of -8.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTM and IBTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTMIBTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-8.36%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-3.66%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-2.69%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-2.37%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

1.38%

-0.15%

Volatility

IBTM vs. IBTO - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) have volatilities of 1.23% and 1.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTMIBTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.27%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

3.15%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

4.40%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

6.59%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.53%

6.59%

+0.94%

IBTM vs. IBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBTM and IBTO have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTM vs. IBTO - Dividend Comparison

IBTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than IBTO's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBTM
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF
3.96%3.87%3.96%3.39%1.38%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
4.15%4.05%4.23%1.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, IBTM and IBTO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBTO has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to IBTM (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTM dropped -13.60% vs IBTO's -8.36%.

On 1-year performance, IBTO leads with 3.25% vs 3.09% for IBTM. Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBTO has performed better with a 3.25% return vs 3.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTM and IBTO have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

IBTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 3.96% for IBTM.

IBTM tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IBTO tracks ICE 2033 Maturity US Treasury Index.

IBTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTM and IBTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer