PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTM vs. FSEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBTM vs. FSEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) and Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBTM vs. FSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBTM
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF
-0.01%8.06%-0.14%3.48%-4.63%
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
0.26%8.33%2.40%5.22%-3.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTM achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than FSEC's 0.26% return.


IBTM

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
1.01%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
10Y*

FSEC

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
0.26%
6M
1.94%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBTM vs. FSEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTM has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FSEC's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBTM vs. FSEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTM
IBTM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IBTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FSEC
FSEC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTM vs. FSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) and Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTMFSECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.83

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

1.20

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.31

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.42

3.57

+0.85

IBTM vs. FSEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the FSEC Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTM and FSEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTMFSECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.83

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.05

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between IBTM and FSEC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IBTM vs. FSEC - Dividend Comparison

IBTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than FSEC's 4.43% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
IBTM
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF
3.91%3.87%3.96%3.39%1.38%0.00%
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
4.43%4.22%3.22%3.41%2.21%0.96%

Drawdowns

IBTM vs. FSEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTM drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, smaller than the maximum FSEC drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTM and FSEC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTMFSECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-17.97%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-4.08%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-1.79%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-6.82%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.50%

-0.49%

Volatility

IBTM vs. FSEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) is 1.54%, while Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) has a volatility of 1.92%. This indicates that IBTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBTMFSECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

1.92%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

3.38%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.77%

6.42%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.69%

6.72%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.69%

6.68%

+1.01%