PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCRB vs. CGSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCRB vs. CGSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCRB achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than CGSM's 1.37% return.


VCRB

1D
0.12%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.63%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGSM

1D
0.08%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.64%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCRB vs. CGSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
0.58%7.56%2.21%0.65%
CGSM
Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
1.37%4.58%3.71%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VCRB and CGSM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023

0.54

The correlation between VCRB and CGSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCRB vs. CGSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCRB
VCRB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CGSM
CGSM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CGSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CGSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCRB vs. CGSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCRBCGSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.82

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

3.98

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.77

13.02

-7.25

VCRB vs. CGSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the CGSM Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCRB and CGSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCRBCGSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

3.52

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

2.89

-1.95

Drawdowns

VCRB vs. CGSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, which is greater than CGSM's maximum drawdown of -1.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRB and CGSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRBCGSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-1.42%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-1.18%

-1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-0.14%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-0.24%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.36%

+0.52%

Volatility

VCRB vs. CGSM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) at 0.43%. This indicates that VCRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRBCGSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

0.43%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

0.98%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

1.33%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.74%

1.79%

+2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

1.79%

+2.95%

VCRB vs. CGSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCRB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CGSM's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCRB vs. CGSM - Dividend Comparison

VCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than CGSM's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGSM
Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
2.99%3.05%3.11%0.84%
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
4.60%4.55%4.22%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCRB and CGSM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCRB has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to CGSM (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCRB dropped -4.59% vs CGSM's -1.42%.

On 1-year performance, VCRB leads with 5.07% vs 4.67% for CGSM. On fees, VCRB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, CGSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VCRB has performed better with a 5.07% return vs 4.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCRB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CGSM.

VCRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.99% for CGSM.

VCRB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while CGSM is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCRB and 0.25% for CGSM.

CGSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCRB and CGSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer