CGSM vs. CGSD
CGSM (Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF) and CGSD (Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGSM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGSM returned 4.23% vs 3.96% for CGSD. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
CGSM vs. CGSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGSM achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than CGSD's 0.72% return.
CGSM
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGSD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGSM vs. CGSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSM Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 1.37% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 4.06% |
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 0.72% | 6.11% | 5.46% | 3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGSM and CGSD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGSM vs. CGSD — Risk / Return Rank
CGSM
CGSD
CGSM vs. CGSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) and Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGSM | CGSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.56 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.57 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.69 | 16.86 | -5.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGSM vs. CGSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGSM drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, smaller than the maximum CGSD drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSM and CGSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGSM | CGSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -1.75% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.18% | -1.11% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.19% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -0.28% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 0.24% | +0.12% |
Volatility
CGSM vs. CGSD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) is 0.32%, while Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) has a volatility of 0.46%. This indicates that CGSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGSM | CGSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.32% | 0.46% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.98% | 1.05% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33% | 1.46% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.78% | 2.16% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.78% | 2.16% | -0.38% |
CGSM vs. CGSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CGSM and CGSD have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CGSM vs. CGSD - Dividend Comparison
CGSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than CGSD's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 4.46% | 4.48% | 4.57% | 4.43% | 0.64% |
CGSM Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 2.99% | 3.05% | 3.11% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGSM and CGSD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGSD has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to CGSM (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGSM dropped -1.42% vs CGSD's -1.75%.
On 1-year performance, CGSM leads with 4.23% vs 3.96% for CGSD. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, CGSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CGSM has performed better with a 4.23% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGSM and CGSD have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
CGSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 2.99% for CGSM.
CGSM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CGSD is Short-Term Bond.
CGSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGSM and CGSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer