PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGSM vs. CGSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGSM vs. CGSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) and Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGSM achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than CGSD's 0.72% return.


CGSM

1D
0.04%
1M
0.65%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.43%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGSD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGSM vs. CGSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGSM
Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
1.37%4.58%3.71%4.06%
CGSD
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
0.72%6.11%5.46%3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CGSM and CGSD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGSM vs. CGSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGSM
CGSM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CGSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CGSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CGSD
CGSD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CGSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CGSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGSD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGSM vs. CGSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) and Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGSMCGSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.56

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

3.57

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.69

16.86

-5.17

CGSM vs. CGSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGSM Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the CGSD Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGSM and CGSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGSM vs. CGSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGSM drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, smaller than the maximum CGSD drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSM and CGSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGSMCGSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-1.75%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.18%

-1.11%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.19%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-0.28%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.24%

+0.12%

Volatility

CGSM vs. CGSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) is 0.32%, while Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) has a volatility of 0.46%. This indicates that CGSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGSMCGSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

0.46%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.98%

1.05%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

1.46%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.78%

2.16%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.78%

2.16%

-0.38%

CGSM vs. CGSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CGSM and CGSD have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CGSM vs. CGSD - Dividend Comparison

CGSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than CGSD's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGSD
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
4.46%4.48%4.57%4.43%0.64%
CGSM
Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
2.99%3.05%3.11%0.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGSM and CGSD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGSD has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to CGSM (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGSM dropped -1.42% vs CGSD's -1.75%.

On 1-year performance, CGSM leads with 4.23% vs 3.96% for CGSD. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, CGSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGSM has performed better with a 4.23% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGSM and CGSD have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

CGSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 2.99% for CGSM.

CGSM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CGSD is Short-Term Bond.

CGSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGSM and CGSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer