PortfoliosLab logo
CGSM vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGSM and FFRHX is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CGSM vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGSM:

1.91

FFRHX:

1.61

Sortino Ratio

CGSM:

2.50

FFRHX:

2.59

Omega Ratio

CGSM:

1.36

FFRHX:

1.61

Calmar Ratio

CGSM:

2.60

FFRHX:

1.54

Martin Ratio

CGSM:

8.35

FFRHX:

7.16

Ulcer Index

CGSM:

0.44%

FFRHX:

0.71%

Daily Std Dev

CGSM:

2.02%

FFRHX:

3.14%

Max Drawdown

CGSM:

-1.42%

FFRHX:

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

CGSM:

-0.52%

FFRHX:

-1.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGSM achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's -0.39% return.


CGSM

YTD

0.74%

1M

0.52%

6M

0.80%

1Y

3.66%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFRHX

YTD

-0.39%

1M

1.79%

6M

0.92%

1Y

5.08%

5Y*

7.50%

10Y*

4.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGSM vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGSM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGSM vs. FFRHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGSM is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGSM is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGSM is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGSM is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGSM is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGSM is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFRHX is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGSM vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CGSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGSM and FFRHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CGSM vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

CGSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than FFRHX's 7.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CGSM
Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
3.07%3.12%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.47%8.33%8.25%5.06%3.27%3.85%5.17%4.75%4.01%3.94%4.25%4.00%

Drawdowns

CGSM vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGSM drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSM and FFRHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CGSM vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) is 0.68%, while Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that CGSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...