VCR vs. STK

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VCR (Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF) and STK (Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund) are both funds - VCR is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while STK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. VCR is passively managed, while STK is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VCR returned 13.76%/yr vs 23.66%/yr for STK. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VCR charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for STK.

Performance

VCR vs. STK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 44.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has underperformed STK with an annualized return of 13.76%, while STK has yielded a comparatively higher 23.66% annualized return.

VCR

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: -0.09%
• 6M: -1.17%
• 1Y: 12.37%
• 3Y*: 13.30%
• 5Y*: 6.00%
• 10Y*: 13.76%

STK

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 44.26%
• 6M: 47.42%
• 1Y: 90.64%
• 3Y*: 30.83%
• 5Y*: 19.37%
• 10Y*: 23.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCR vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF	-0.09%	5.77%	24.27%	40.38%	-35.15%	24.86%	48.36%	27.45%	-2.31%	22.82%
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund	44.26%	24.85%	17.74%	46.60%	-30.36%	48.63%	25.39%	52.73%	-14.91%	33.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VCR and STK is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2009	0.61

The correlation between VCR and STK shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VCR vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCR

VCR Risk / Return Rank: 20
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 19
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 21

STK

STK Risk / Return Rank: 94
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 89
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCR vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VCR	STK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	3.44	-2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	3.88	-2.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.57	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	5.57	-4.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.21	24.83	-22.62

VCR vs. STK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the STK Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCR and STK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VCR vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, which is greater than STK's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and STK.

Drawdown Indicators

	VCR	STK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.54%	-41.74%	-19.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.59%	-16.05%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.36%	-26.59%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.20%	-36.27%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.20%	-41.74%	+2.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.64%	-9.90%	+5.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.39%	-7.41%	-1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.05%	3.60%	+1.45%

Volatility

VCR vs. STK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) is 6.17%, while Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that VCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VCR	STK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.17%	15.03%	-8.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.48%	22.75%	-9.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.62%	26.01%	-7.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.03%	25.66%	-1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.43%	26.40%	-3.97%

VCR vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

VCR vs. STK - Dividend Comparison

VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than STK's 5.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund	5.23%	7.38%	16.02%	6.70%	12.62%	8.48%	6.79%	7.86%	14.88%	11.82%	9.87%	10.32%
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF	0.73%	0.74%	0.74%	0.84%	0.98%	0.79%	1.71%	1.17%	1.37%	1.21%	1.60%	1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VCR and STK in my portfolio?

VCR and STK have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VCR or STK?

STK has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to VCR (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCR dropped -61.54% vs STK's -41.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.