VCOB vs. BLUC

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

VCOB (Voya Core Bond ETF) and BLUC (Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCOB is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Voya, while BLUC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bluemonte. Both are actively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VCOB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLUC.

Performance

VCOB vs. BLUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Core Bond ETF (VCOB) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCOB achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than BLUC's 5.52% return.

VCOB

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.76%
• 6M: -2.50%
• YTD: -2.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BLUC

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -2.14%
• 6M: 3.99%
• YTD: 5.52%
• 1Y: 13.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	$778.12K	$824.08K	$1.12M
VCOB Voya Core Bond ETF	$300.60K	$226.80K	$472.29K

VCOB vs. BLUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VCOB Voya Core Bond ETF	-2.21%	0.35%
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	5.52%	3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between VCOB and BLUC is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

VCOB vs. BLUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VCOB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUC

BLUC Risk / Return Rank: 41
BLUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BLUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
BLUC Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BLUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BLUC Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VCOB vs. BLUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Core Bond ETF (VCOB) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VCOB	BLUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.98	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.18	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.28	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.84	—

Drawdowns

VCOB vs. BLUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCOB drawdown since its inception was -3.53%, smaller than the maximum BLUC drawdown of -10.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCOB and BLUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VCOB	BLUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-10.69%	+7.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-5.66%	+2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-1.76%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VCOB	BLUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82%	13.94%	-10.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.82%	13.48%	-9.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.82%	13.48%	-9.66%

VCOB vs. BLUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCOB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUC's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VCOB vs. BLUC - Dividend Comparison

VCOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than BLUC's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	0.65%	0.46%
VCOB Voya Core Bond ETF	0.50%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VCOB and BLUC in my portfolio?

VCOB and BLUC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VCOB or BLUC?

On fees, BLUC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VCOB or BLUC?

BLUC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VCOB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VCOB or BLUC?

BLUC has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.50% for VCOB.

What is the main difference between VCOB and BLUC?

VCOB is categorized as Actively Managed, while BLUC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Voya and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VCOB and 0.23% for BLUC.