PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCMDX vs. GDXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCMDX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCMDX achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -10.70% return.


VCMDX

1D
-2.09%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
18.92%
6M
19.63%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*

GDXJ

1D
1.01%
1M
-19.25%
YTD
-10.70%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
50.65%
3Y*
42.13%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCMDX vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VCMDX
Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares
18.92%18.20%5.27%-7.45%13.83%34.82%5.07%2.74%
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-10.70%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VCMDX and GDXJ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.39

The correlation between VCMDX and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCMDX vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCMDX
VCMDX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VCMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
VCMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCMDX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCMDXGDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.20

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

1.43

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

3.72

+8.67

VCMDX vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCMDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCMDX and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCMDXGDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.00

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.39

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.05

+0.77

Drawdowns

VCMDX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCMDX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCMDX and GDXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCMDXGDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.67%

-88.66%

+61.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.25%

-35.60%

+28.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.90%

-35.60%

+25.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.45%

-50.99%

+25.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.53%

-34.94%

+28.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-60.48%

+49.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

13.67%

-11.24%

Volatility

VCMDX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX) is 4.98%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that VCMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCMDXGDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

17.66%

-12.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

42.71%

-29.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.01%

50.84%

-35.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

41.34%

-25.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.40%

44.15%

-28.75%

VCMDX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCMDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCMDX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

VCMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.79%, more than GDXJ's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.61%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%
VCMDX
Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares
12.79%15.21%2.19%2.50%14.21%30.56%0.50%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCMDX and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to VCMDX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCMDX dropped -26.67% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

VCMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCMDX and GDXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer