PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCEB vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCEB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCEB achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.


VCEB

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.15%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCEB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VCEB
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF
0.32%7.48%2.23%8.52%-15.15%-1.99%2.46%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between VCEB and VOO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCEB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCEB
VCEB Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VCEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCEB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VCEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCEB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCEB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCEBVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

2.39

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

3.25

-1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.16

-1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.87

14.73

-8.85

VCEB vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCEB and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCEBVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.39

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.83

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.89

-0.84

Drawdowns

VCEB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCEB drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCEB and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCEBVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.60%

-33.99%

+12.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-8.90%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.09%

-18.69%

+12.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.39%

-24.52%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.70%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-3.69%

-3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

1.91%

-1.00%

Volatility

VCEB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) is 1.32%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that VCEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCEBVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

2.84%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

8.90%

-5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

11.80%

-7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.84%

16.81%

-9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.66%

18.01%

-11.35%

VCEB vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCEB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCEB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VCEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCEB
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF
4.65%4.57%4.47%3.70%2.84%1.69%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCEB and VOO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to VCEB (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCEB dropped -21.60% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 0.51% for VCEB. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VCEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 0.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VCEB.

VCEB has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

VCEB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. VCEB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corp SRI Select Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VCEB and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCEB and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer