PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCEB vs. BGRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCEB vs. BGRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCEB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than BGRN's 0.64% return.


VCEB

1D
0.01%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*

BGRN

1D
0.11%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.83%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCEB vs. BGRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VCEB
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF
0.50%7.48%2.23%8.52%-15.15%-1.99%2.46%
BGRN
iShares USD Green Bond ETF
0.64%7.27%2.77%6.50%-13.06%-2.80%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VCEB and BGRN is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.89

The correlation between VCEB and BGRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCEB vs. BGRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCEB
VCEB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VCEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCEB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
VCEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCEB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BGRN
BGRN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BGRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGRN Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BGRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGRN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCEB vs. BGRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCEBBGRNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

1.84

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

2.82

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.33

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.96

7.86

-1.90

VCEB vs. BGRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the BGRN Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCEB and BGRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCEBBGRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.84

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.12

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.46

-0.40

Drawdowns

VCEB vs. BGRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCEB drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, which is greater than BGRN's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCEB and BGRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCEBBGRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.60%

-19.16%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-2.23%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.09%

-4.55%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.39%

-18.73%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.63%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-5.79%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.66%

+0.25%

Volatility

VCEB vs. BGRN - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN) at 1.06%. This indicates that VCEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCEBBGRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

1.06%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

2.26%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

2.97%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.84%

5.46%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.66%

5.00%

+1.66%

VCEB vs. BGRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCEB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BGRN's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCEB vs. BGRN - Dividend Comparison

VCEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than BGRN's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BGRN
iShares USD Green Bond ETF
4.28%4.21%4.07%3.52%2.66%0.78%1.82%3.66%0.21%
VCEB
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF
4.64%4.57%4.47%3.70%2.84%1.69%0.43%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VCEB and BGRN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VCEB has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to BGRN (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCEB dropped -21.60% vs BGRN's -19.16%.

On 5-year performance, VCEB leads with 0.66% vs 0.63% for BGRN. On fees, VCEB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, BGRN has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VCEB has performed better with a 0.66% return vs 0.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCEB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for BGRN.

VCEB has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 4.28% for BGRN.

VCEB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BGRN is Global Bonds. VCEB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corp SRI Select Index, while BGRN tracks Bloomberg MSCI USD Green Bond Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VCEB and 0.20% for BGRN.

BGRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCEB and BGRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer