VCAR vs. MTBA
VCAR (Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF) and MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCAR is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, VCAR returned -14.28% vs 5.18% for MTBA. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VCAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTBA.
Performance
VCAR vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCAR achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's -0.23% return.
VCAR
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- 23.98%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- -18.80%
- 1Y
- -14.28%
- 3Y*
- 33.50%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- —
MTBA
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCAR vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 0.60% | -14.73% | 152.27% | 6.97% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.23% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCAR and MTBA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | 0.09 |
VCAR vs. MTBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VCAR
MTBA
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
VCAR
MTBA
-
Basic Materials
VCAR
-
MTBA
-
Communication Services
VCAR
-
MTBA
-
Consumer Defensive
VCAR
-
MTBA
-
Energy
VCAR
-
MTBA
-
Financial Services
VCAR
-
MTBA
Healthcare
VCAR
-
MTBA
-
Industrials
VCAR
-
MTBA
-
Real Estate
VCAR
-
MTBA
-
Technology
VCAR
-
MTBA
-
Utilities
VCAR
-
MTBA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCAR vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank
VCAR
MTBA
VCAR vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCAR | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 1.84 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 6.28 | -6.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCAR | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 1.68 | -1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 1.30 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
VCAR vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCAR drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCAR and MTBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCAR | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.11% | -3.48% | -65.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.12% | -2.82% | -53.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.58% | -1.60% | -35.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.70% | -0.79% | -36.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.22% | 0.83% | +30.39% |
Volatility
VCAR vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) has a higher volatility of 24.38% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 1.33%. This indicates that VCAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCAR | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.38% | 1.33% | +23.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.08% | 2.47% | +38.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.90% | 3.10% | +53.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.69% | 3.95% | +46.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.02% | 3.95% | +46.07% |
VCAR vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
VCAR vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison
VCAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.86%, more than MTBA's 6.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.09% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% |
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 22.86% | 23.87% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCAR and MTBA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCAR has higher volatility (24.38%) compared to MTBA (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCAR dropped -69.11% vs MTBA's -3.48%.
On 1-year performance, MTBA leads with 5.18% vs -14.28% for VCAR. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTBA has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MTBA has performed better with a 5.18% return vs -14.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for VCAR.
VCAR has the higher dividend yield at 22.86%, compared with 6.09% for MTBA.
VCAR is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while MTBA is Mortgage Backed Securities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for VCAR and 0.15% for MTBA.
MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCAR and MTBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer