VCAR vs. SMH
VCAR (Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCAR is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. VCAR is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VCAR returned 9.84%/yr vs 36.02%/yr for SMH. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VCAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
VCAR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCAR achieves a -10.37% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 62.61% return.
VCAR
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -10.16%
- YTD
- -10.37%
- 1Y
- -22.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -4.16%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- 6M
- 49.91%
- YTD
- 62.61%
- 1Y
- 104.33%
- 3Y*
- 55.82%
- 5Y*
- 36.02%
- 10Y*
- 35.93%
VCAR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | -10.37% | -14.73% | 152.27% | 58.33% | -61.11% | 18.52% | 2.57% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 62.61% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCAR and SMH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between VCAR and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VCAR vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VCAR
SMH
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
VCAR
SMH
-
Basic Materials
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Communication Services
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Energy
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Industrials
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Technology
VCAR
-
SMH
Utilities
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCAR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
VCAR
SMH
VCAR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VCAR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.43 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 7.03 | -7.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 22.83 | -23.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VCAR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCAR drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCAR and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCAR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.11% | -84.96% | +15.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.12% | -14.93% | -41.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.12% | -35.74% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.11% | -45.30% | -23.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.38% | -12.45% | -31.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.76% | -40.94% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.93% | 4.59% | +29.34% |
Volatility
VCAR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) have volatilities of 18.67% and 18.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCAR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.67% | 18.45% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.91% | 31.29% | +7.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.15% | 36.76% | +20.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.47% | 36.19% | +15.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.34% | 33.14% | +17.20% |
VCAR vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VCAR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
VCAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.69%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 24.69% | 23.87% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCAR and SMH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCAR has higher volatility (18.67%) compared to SMH (18.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCAR dropped -69.11% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 36.02% vs 9.84% for VCAR. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 18.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.02% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for VCAR.
VCAR has the higher dividend yield at 24.69%, compared with 0.19% for SMH.
VCAR is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for VCAR and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCAR and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer