VCAR vs. SMH
VCAR (Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCAR is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. VCAR is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VCAR returned 8.82%/yr vs 38.18%/yr for SMH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VCAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
VCAR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCAR achieves a -12.28% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return.
VCAR
- 1D
- -6.80%
- 1M
- -14.12%
- YTD
- -12.28%
- 6M
- -17.99%
- 1Y
- -31.81%
- 3Y*
- 26.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 72.73%
- 6M
- 71.29%
- 1Y
- 138.23%
- 3Y*
- 62.28%
- 5Y*
- 38.18%
- 10Y*
- 37.85%
VCAR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | -12.28% | -14.73% | 152.27% | 58.33% | -61.11% | 18.52% | 2.57% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.73% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCAR and SMH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VCAR and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VCAR vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VCAR
SMH
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
VCAR
SMH
-
Basic Materials
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Communication Services
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Energy
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Industrials
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Technology
VCAR
-
SMH
Utilities
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCAR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
VCAR
SMH
VCAR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VCAR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.58 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 9.31 | -9.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 33.88 | -34.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VCAR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCAR drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCAR and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCAR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.11% | -84.96% | +15.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.12% | -14.93% | -41.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.12% | -35.74% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.11% | -45.30% | -23.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.57% | -7.01% | -38.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.71% | -41.01% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.64% | 4.10% | +28.54% |
Volatility
VCAR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) is 15.88%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that VCAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCAR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.88% | 19.08% | -3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.68% | 29.18% | +12.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.85% | 34.87% | +22.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.05% | 35.83% | +15.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.14% | 32.97% | +17.17% |
VCAR vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VCAR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
VCAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.22%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 26.22% | 23.87% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCAR and SMH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to VCAR (15.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCAR dropped -69.11% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 38.18% vs 8.82% for VCAR. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VCAR has been the lower-risk option at 15.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.18% return vs 8.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for VCAR.
VCAR has the higher dividend yield at 26.22%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
VCAR is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for VCAR and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCAR and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer