VCAR vs. SMH
VCAR (Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCAR is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. VCAR is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VCAR returned 4.30%/yr vs 33.46%/yr for SMH. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VCAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
VCAR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCAR achieves a -29.86% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 50.09% return.
VCAR
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -21.76%
- 6M
- -25.49%
- YTD
- -29.86%
- 1Y
- -35.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.20%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -8.74%
- 6M
- 33.97%
- YTD
- 50.09%
- 1Y
- 90.95%
- 3Y*
- 50.56%
- 5Y*
- 33.46%
- 10Y*
- 34.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.28B | $7.64B | $7.07B | |
| $120.21K | $121.08K | $205.86K |
VCAR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | -29.86% | -14.73% | 152.27% | 58.33% | -61.11% | 18.52% | 2.57% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 50.09% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCAR and SMH is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VCAR and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
VCAR vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VCAR
SMH
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
VCAR
SMH
-
Basic Materials
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Communication Services
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Energy
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Industrials
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Technology
VCAR
-
SMH
Utilities
VCAR
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCAR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
VCAR
SMH
VCAR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VCAR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.36 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 3.58 | -4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 14.64 | -15.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VCAR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCAR drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCAR and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCAR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.11% | -84.96% | +15.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.54% | -24.62% | -33.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.54% | -35.74% | -22.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.11% | -45.30% | -23.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.48% | -19.19% | -37.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.90% | -40.89% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.03% | 6.01% | +30.02% |
Volatility
VCAR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) has a higher volatility of 20.19% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 14.70%. This indicates that VCAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCAR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.19% | 14.70% | +5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.35% | 33.13% | +8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.04% | 38.57% | +19.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.92% | 36.50% | +15.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.55% | 33.32% | +17.23% |
VCAR vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VCAR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
VCAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.55%, more than SMH's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 31.55% | 23.87% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCAR and SMH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCAR has higher volatility (20.19%) compared to SMH (14.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCAR dropped -69.11% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 33.46% vs 4.30% for VCAR. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 14.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 33.46% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for VCAR.
VCAR has the higher dividend yield at 31.55%, compared with 0.20% for SMH.
VCAR is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for VCAR and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCAR and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer