PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBTC.PA vs. EGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBTC.PA vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBTC.PA achieves a -27.36% return, which is significantly lower than EGLN.L's 4.83% return.


VBTC.PA

1D
-3.96%
1M
-21.14%
YTD
-27.36%
6M
-31.38%
1Y
-40.99%
3Y*
29.35%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*

EGLN.L

1D
0.55%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
4.83%
6M
6.32%
1Y
30.19%
3Y*
28.02%
5Y*
19.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBTC.PA vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VBTC.PA
VanEck Bitcoin ETN A
-27.36%-17.91%135.65%144.60%-63.85%42.43%
EGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
4.83%46.01%34.32%9.37%6.00%3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VBTC.PA and EGLN.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2021

0.02

The correlation between VBTC.PA and EGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBTC.PA vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBTC.PA
VBTC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VBTC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

EGLN.L
EGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBTC.PA vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBTC.PAEGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.26

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

1.80

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

4.58

-6.02

VBTC.PA vs. EGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBTC.PA Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the EGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBTC.PA and EGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBTC.PAEGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.05

1.30

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

1.22

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.95

-0.72

Drawdowns

VBTC.PA vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBTC.PA drawdown since its inception was -74.29%, which is greater than EGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBTC.PA and EGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBTC.PAEGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.29%

-18.35%

-55.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.44%

-16.70%

-32.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.44%

-16.70%

-32.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.29%

-16.70%

-57.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.88%

-15.21%

-33.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-6.34%

-25.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.43%

6.57%

+21.86%

Volatility

VBTC.PA vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) at 5.42%. This indicates that VBTC.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBTC.PAEGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

5.42%

+4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.59%

20.15%

+8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.90%

23.14%

+15.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.76%

16.17%

+36.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.80%

14.38%

+38.42%

VBTC.PA vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBTC.PA has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than EGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBTC.PA vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VBTC.PA nor EGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VBTC.PA and EGLN.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for VBTC.PA.

VBTC.PA is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while EGLN.L is Gold. VBTC.PA tracks MVIS Cryptocompare Bitcoin VWAP Close Index, while EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for VBTC.PA and 0.25% for EGLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBTC.PA and EGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer