PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBTC.PA vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VBTC.PA vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VBTC.PA vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VBTC.PA
VanEck Bitcoin ETN A
-21.68%-17.91%114.40%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-20.98%-17.52%111.13%
Different Trading Currencies

VBTC.PA is traded in EUR, while IBIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBIT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VBTC.PA having a -21.68% return and IBIT slightly higher at -21.39%.


VBTC.PA

1D
2.00%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
-21.68%
6M
-41.21%
1Y
-25.22%
3Y*
30.14%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
-21.39%
6M
-41.59%
1Y
-25.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VBTC.PA vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBTC.PA has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VBTC.PA vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBTC.PA
VBTC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
VBTC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBTC.PA vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBTC.PAIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

-0.57

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.72

-0.58

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.93

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

-0.47

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.97

-1.00

+0.03

VBTC.PA vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBTC.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBTC.PA and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBTC.PAIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

-0.57

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.30

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between VBTC.PA and IBIT is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VBTC.PA vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither VBTC.PA nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

VBTC.PA vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBTC.PA drawdown since its inception was -74.29%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBTC.PA and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VBTC.PAIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.29%

-49.36%

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.44%

-49.36%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.88%

-45.80%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.85%

-14.18%

-17.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.21%

23.27%

-0.06%

Volatility

VBTC.PA vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) have volatilities of 12.51% and 12.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VBTC.PAIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.51%

12.51%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.69%

36.63%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.87%

45.76%

-5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.28%

51.22%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.28%

51.22%

+2.06%