PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBTC.PA vs. DAVV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VBTC.PA vs. DAVV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA) and VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF (DAVV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VBTC.PA vs. DAVV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VBTC.PA
VanEck Bitcoin ETN A
-21.68%-17.91%135.65%144.60%-63.85%42.43%
DAVV.DE
VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF
-10.02%-0.68%37.42%337.08%-85.83%-13.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBTC.PA achieves a -21.68% return, which is significantly lower than DAVV.DE's -10.02% return.


VBTC.PA

1D
2.00%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
-21.68%
6M
-41.21%
1Y
-25.22%
3Y*
30.14%
5Y*
10Y*

DAVV.DE

1D
5.51%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
-10.02%
6M
-31.46%
1Y
49.97%
3Y*
46.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VBTC.PA vs. DAVV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBTC.PA has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DAVV.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VBTC.PA vs. DAVV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBTC.PA
VBTC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
VBTC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

DAVV.DE
DAVV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DAVV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAVV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAVV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DAVV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAVV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBTC.PA vs. DAVV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA) and VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF (DAVV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBTC.PADAVV.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

0.80

-1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.72

1.40

-2.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.17

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

0.96

-1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.97

1.95

-2.92

VBTC.PA vs. DAVV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBTC.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the DAVV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBTC.PA and DAVV.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBTC.PADAVV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

0.80

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-0.14

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between VBTC.PA and DAVV.DE is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VBTC.PA vs. DAVV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VBTC.PA nor DAVV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

VBTC.PA vs. DAVV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBTC.PA drawdown since its inception was -74.29%, smaller than the maximum DAVV.DE drawdown of -91.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBTC.PA and DAVV.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VBTC.PADAVV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.29%

-91.53%

+17.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.44%

-45.68%

-3.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.88%

-53.71%

+8.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.85%

-58.28%

+26.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.21%

22.42%

+0.79%

Volatility

VBTC.PA vs. DAVV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA) is 12.51%, while VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF (DAVV.DE) has a volatility of 15.62%. This indicates that VBTC.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAVV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VBTC.PADAVV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.51%

15.62%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.69%

46.85%

-15.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.87%

62.37%

-22.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.28%

71.06%

-17.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.28%

71.06%

-17.78%