PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. ISCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly lower than ISCG's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has underperformed ISCG with an annualized return of 11.02%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.


VBR

1D
0.18%
1M
2.65%
YTD
13.42%
6M
11.41%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
11.02%

ISCG

1D
0.09%
1M
3.57%
YTD
15.33%
6M
11.70%
1Y
33.36%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
13.42%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
15.33%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and ISCG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2004

0.87

The correlation between VBR and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBR vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBR
ISCG

Financial Services

17.5%
9.9%

Industrials

17.4%
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
8.8%

Technology

12.1%
22.0%

Real Estate

10.5%
4.8%

Healthcare

8.3%
16.8%

Basic Materials

6.0%
3.2%

Utilities

4.6%
1.1%

Energy

4.3%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.7%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.8%

Financial Services

VBR
17.5%
ISCG
9.9%

Industrials

VBR
17.4%
ISCG
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VBR
12.5%
ISCG
8.8%

Technology

VBR
12.1%
ISCG
22.0%

Real Estate

VBR
10.5%
ISCG
4.8%

Healthcare

VBR
8.3%
ISCG
16.8%

Basic Materials

VBR
6.0%
ISCG
3.2%

Utilities

VBR
4.6%
ISCG
1.1%

Energy

VBR
4.3%
ISCG
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

VBR
4.0%
ISCG
2.7%

Communication Services

VBR
2.8%
ISCG
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBRISCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.93

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

11.16

-0.05

VBR vs. ISCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the ISCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and ISCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBR vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than ISCG's maximum drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and ISCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBRISCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-57.72%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-11.43%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-26.71%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-37.80%

+13.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

-41.48%

-3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

0.00%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-11.61%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

3.00%

-0.50%

Volatility

VBR vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.97%, while iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBRISCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

5.78%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

13.64%

-2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

18.60%

-3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

23.03%

-3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

23.20%

-1.45%

VBR vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBR vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than ISCG's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.58%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBR and ISCG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to VBR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs ISCG's -57.72%.

On 10-year performance, ISCG leads with 12.03% vs 11.02% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISCG has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for ISCG.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.58% for ISCG.

VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while ISCG is Small Cap Growth Equities. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.06% for ISCG.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and ISCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer