PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBK vs. XJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBK vs. XJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly lower than XJR's 15.29% return.


VBK

1D
0.58%
1M
0.15%
YTD
14.03%
6M
12.70%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
11.47%

XJR

1D
0.74%
1M
0.49%
YTD
15.29%
6M
14.96%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBK vs. XJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
14.03%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%29.98%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.29%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%

Correlation

The correlation between VBK and XJR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.86

The correlation between VBK and XJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBK vs. XJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBK
XJR

Technology

25.9%
16.8%

Industrials

24.7%
15.5%

Healthcare

15.3%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
13.5%

Financial Services

5.6%
18.2%

Energy

4.8%
4.7%

Real Estate

3.9%
7.6%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
2.7%

Utilities

1.2%
2.0%

Technology

VBK
25.9%
XJR
16.8%

Industrials

VBK
24.7%
XJR
15.5%

Healthcare

VBK
15.3%
XJR
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VBK
9.6%
XJR
13.5%

Financial Services

VBK
5.6%
XJR
18.2%

Energy

VBK
4.8%
XJR
4.7%

Real Estate

VBK
3.9%
XJR
7.6%

Communication Services

VBK
3.5%
XJR
2.5%

Basic Materials

VBK
3.2%
XJR
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

VBK
2.4%
XJR
2.7%

Utilities

VBK
1.2%
XJR
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBK vs. XJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBK vs. XJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBKXJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.93

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

9.42

-0.32

VBK vs. XJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the XJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and XJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBKXJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.55

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.24

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.67

-0.24

Drawdowns

VBK vs. XJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than XJR's maximum drawdown of -27.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and XJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBKXJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-27.14%

-31.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-9.43%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-27.14%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-27.14%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-1.08%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-9.46%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.93%

+0.09%

Volatility

VBK vs. XJR - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) at 5.06%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBKXJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

5.06%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.18%

12.41%

+2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.65%

17.95%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.54%

21.45%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.90%

21.73%

+1.17%

VBK vs. XJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XJR's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBK vs. XJR - Dividend Comparison

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than XJR's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.46%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.99%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBK and XJR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBK has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to XJR (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs XJR's -27.14%.

On 5-year performance, XJR leads with 5.18% vs 4.73% for VBK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XJR has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XJR has performed better with a 5.18% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XJR.

XJR has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.46% for VBK.

VBK is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while XJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBK and 0.12% for XJR.

XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBK and XJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer