PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBK vs. SMMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBK vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 3.94% return.


VBK

1D
-1.56%
1M
1.50%
YTD
16.76%
6M
13.90%
1Y
30.40%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
12.03%

SMMV

1D
1.03%
1M
0.28%
YTD
3.94%
6M
2.94%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBK vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
16.76%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
3.94%6.42%18.29%5.63%-10.00%16.64%-2.88%24.21%1.15%14.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VBK and SMMV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2016

0.78

The correlation between VBK and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VBK vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBK
SMMV

Technology

27.2%
14.5%

Industrials

24.6%
13.5%

Healthcare

14.4%
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
5.1%

Financial Services

5.4%
8.9%

Energy

4.4%
5.3%

Real Estate

3.5%
12.6%

Communication Services

3.0%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
8.0%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.6%

Utilities

1.3%
7.5%

Technology

VBK
27.2%
SMMV
14.5%

Industrials

VBK
24.6%
SMMV
13.5%

Healthcare

VBK
14.4%
SMMV
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VBK
7.9%
SMMV
5.1%

Financial Services

VBK
5.4%
SMMV
8.9%

Energy

VBK
4.4%
SMMV
5.3%

Real Estate

VBK
3.5%
SMMV
12.6%

Communication Services

VBK
3.0%
SMMV
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

VBK
2.7%
SMMV
8.0%

Basic Materials

VBK
2.7%
SMMV
1.6%

Utilities

VBK
1.3%
SMMV
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBK vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMV
SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBK vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBKSMMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.15

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.17

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

3.53

+6.46

VBK vs. SMMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the SMMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and SMMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBK vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and SMMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBKSMMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-38.77%

-19.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-7.02%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-13.68%

-13.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-18.00%

-20.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-2.67%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-5.09%

-5.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.33%

+0.72%

Volatility

VBK vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.48%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBKSMMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

2.48%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.65%

6.51%

+9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

9.84%

+10.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

13.48%

+10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

15.66%

+7.25%

VBK vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBK vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than SMMV's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
1.74%1.77%1.76%2.30%1.67%1.08%1.39%1.64%1.72%1.63%0.79%0.00%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBK and SMMV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBK has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to SMMV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs SMMV's -38.77%.

On 5-year performance, SMMV leads with 5.19% vs 4.59% for VBK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMMV has performed better with a 5.19% return vs 4.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.

VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBK and 0.20% for SMMV.

VBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBK and SMMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer