VBK vs. SLYG
VBK (Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - VBK tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index while SLYG tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBK returned 11.74%/yr vs 10.83%/yr for SLYG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBK charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYG.
Performance
VBK vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly higher than SLYG's 15.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VBK has outperformed SLYG with an annualized return of 11.74%, while SLYG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.
VBK
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 17.41%
- 6M
- 16.96%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
SLYG
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 15.50%
- 6M
- 13.61%
- 1Y
- 26.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
VBK vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 17.41% | 8.50% | 16.50% | 21.45% | -28.44% | 5.66% | 35.44% | 32.75% | -5.70% | 21.87% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 15.50% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBK and SLYG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VBK and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
VBK vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBK
SLYG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
VBK
SLYG
Industrials
VBK
SLYG
Healthcare
VBK
SLYG
Consumer Cyclical
VBK
SLYG
Financial Services
VBK
SLYG
Energy
VBK
SLYG
Real Estate
VBK
SLYG
Communication Services
VBK
SLYG
Basic Materials
VBK
SLYG
Consumer Defensive
VBK
SLYG
Utilities
VBK
SLYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBK vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank
VBK
SLYG
VBK vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBK | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.89 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 10.11 | +0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBK | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.50 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.26 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.48 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.31 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
VBK vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and SLYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBK | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -62.15% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -9.10% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -27.39% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.39% | -29.18% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.70% | -41.86% | +3.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -1.42% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.15% | -14.55% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.60% | +0.39% |
Volatility
VBK vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) at 4.59%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBK | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 4.59% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 12.47% | +2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.21% | 17.57% | +1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 21.51% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 22.74% | +0.12% |
VBK vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBK vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than SLYG's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.36% | 0.44% | 0.57% | 0.79% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBK and SLYG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VBK has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to SLYG (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs SLYG's -62.15%.
On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 11.74% vs 10.83% for SLYG. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBK is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.
SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.
VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VBK and 0.15% for SLYG.
VBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBK and SLYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer