VBCI vs. VGT
VBCI (Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCI is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2035 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBCI charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
VBCI vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCI
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 22.48%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 49.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 24.81%
VBCI vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCI Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.24% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 32.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCI and VGT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCI vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
VBCI
VGT
VBCI vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBCI | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.66 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
VBCI vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCI drawdown since its inception was -2.21%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCI and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCI | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -54.63% | +52.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -8.34% | +7.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -7.95% | +7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.15% | — |
Volatility
VBCI vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCI | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.69% | 21.51% | -15.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 25.31% | -19.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 24.68% | -18.99% |
VBCI vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCI vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
VBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCI Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCI and VGT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBCI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBCI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.
VBCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VBCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VGT is Technology Equities. VBCI tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCI and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for VBCI and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer