PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBCI vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBCI vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VBCI

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGT

1D
-6.14%
1M
5.22%
YTD
22.48%
6M
20.33%
1Y
49.26%
3Y*
30.47%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
24.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCI vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VBCI and VGT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBCI vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBCI

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBCI vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VBCI vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBCIVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.66

+0.50

Drawdowns

VBCI vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCI drawdown since its inception was -2.21%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCI and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCIVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-54.63%

+52.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-8.34%

+7.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-7.95%

+7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

Volatility

VBCI vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCIVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

21.51%

-15.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

25.31%

-19.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.69%

24.68%

-18.99%

VBCI vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBCI vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBCI
Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBCI and VGT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VBCI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VBCI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

VBCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VBCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VGT is Technology Equities. VBCI tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCI and 0.09% for VGT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBCI and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer