PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBCI vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBCI vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCI) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VBCI

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VT

1D
-3.07%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
9.20%
6M
9.69%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCI vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VBCI and VT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBCI vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBCI

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBCI vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCI) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VBCI vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBCIVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.43

+0.74

Drawdowns

VBCI vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCI drawdown since its inception was -2.21%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCI and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCIVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-50.27%

+48.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-3.56%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-7.02%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

Volatility

VBCI vs. VT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCIVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

13.09%

-7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

16.10%

-10.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.69%

17.26%

-11.57%

VBCI vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBCI vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VT's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBCI
Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.64%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBCI and VT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCI.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.86% for VBCI.

VBCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VT is Global Equities. VBCI tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCI and 0.06% for VT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBCI and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer