VBCF vs. FLOT
VBCF (Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCF is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while FLOT is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VBCF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLOT.
Performance
VBCF vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLOT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 3.06%
VBCF vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% |
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCF and FLOT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCF vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank
VBCF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLOT
VBCF vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCF | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 3.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 10.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 100.63 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCF vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCF drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum FLOT drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCF and FLOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCF | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -13.54% | +11.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | 0.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -0.21% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
VBCF vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCF | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.26% | 0.75% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 1.77% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 4.15% | +0.11% |
VBCF vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCF vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison
VBCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than FLOT's 4.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 4.47% | 4.84% | 5.82% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.46% | 0.97% | 0.53% |
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCF and FLOT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBCF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBCF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLOT.
FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 0.89% for VBCF.
VBCF is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLOT is Ultrashort Bond. VBCF tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCF and 0.15% for FLOT.
Find the right allocation for VBCF and FLOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer