FLOT vs. FLRN
FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) and FLRN (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLOT is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index, while FLRN is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FLOT returned 3.04%/yr vs 3.03%/yr for FLRN. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
FLOT vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLOT having a 1.99% return and FLRN slightly lower at 1.93%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLOT having a 3.04% annualized return and FLRN not far behind at 3.03%.
FLOT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.04%
FLRN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
FLOT vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.99% | 4.91% | 6.53% | 6.43% | 1.28% | 0.45% | 0.87% | 3.97% | 1.48% | 1.65% |
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.93% | 5.01% | 6.32% | 6.54% | 1.31% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 4.02% | 1.39% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOT and FLRN is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2011 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, FLOT and FLRN have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOT vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank
FLOT
FLRN
FLOT vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLOT | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.23 | 3.33 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.32 | 21.24 | -9.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 105.27 | 127.12 | -21.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLOT vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and FLRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOT | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.54% | -14.64% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.43% | -0.23% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.57% | -1.43% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.36% | -2.16% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.54% | -14.64% | +1.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -1.82% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.04% | +0.01% |
Volatility
FLOT vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) has a higher volatility of 0.21% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.16%. This indicates that FLOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLOT | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 0.16% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.63% | 0.53% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75% | 0.69% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 1.69% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 4.20% | -0.05% |
FLOT vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLOT and FLRN have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLOT vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison
FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, which matches FLRN's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.84% | 5.82% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.46% | 0.97% | 0.53% |
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.50% | 4.89% | 5.67% | 5.68% | 1.95% | 0.39% | 1.22% | 2.76% | 2.39% | 1.64% | 1.06% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLOT and FLRN have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLOT has higher volatility (0.21%) compared to FLRN (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOT dropped -13.54% vs FLRN's -14.64%.
On 10-year performance, FLOT leads with 3.04% vs 3.03% for FLRN. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 3.04% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLOT and FLRN have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 4.50% for FLRN.
FLOT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FLRN is Corporate Bonds. FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index, while FLRN tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.
FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.03 vs 6.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLOT and FLRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer