PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLOT vs. FLRN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FLOTFLRN
YTD Return5.76%5.58%
1Y Return6.61%6.61%
3Y Return (Ann)4.45%4.44%
5Y Return (Ann)3.00%2.96%
10Y Return (Ann)2.34%2.35%
Sharpe Ratio8.207.52
Sortino Ratio15.0214.19
Omega Ratio4.574.19
Calmar Ratio15.0214.49
Martin Ratio162.39179.30
Ulcer Index0.04%0.04%
Daily Std Dev0.81%0.88%
Max Drawdown-13.54%-14.64%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.06%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between FLOT and FLRN is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FLOT vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLOT having a 5.76% return and FLRN slightly lower at 5.58%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLOT having a 2.34% annualized return and FLRN not far ahead at 2.35%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.94%
2.87%
FLOT
FLRN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLOT vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for FLOT: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for FLRN: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLOT vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLOT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLOT, currently valued at 8.20, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.008.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLOT, currently valued at 15.02, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLOT, currently valued at 4.57, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.004.57
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLOT, currently valued at 15.02, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0015.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLOT, currently valued at 162.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00162.39
FLRN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 7.52, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.007.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 14.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0014.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 4.19, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.004.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 14.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0014.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 179.30, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00179.30

FLOT vs. FLRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOT Sharpe Ratio is 8.20, which is comparable to the FLRN Sharpe Ratio of 7.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOT and FLRN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio7.008.009.0010.0011.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.20
7.52
FLOT
FLRN

Dividends

FLOT vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, which matches FLRN's 5.87% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
5.92%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.45%0.97%0.53%0.44%0.48%
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
5.87%5.68%1.95%0.40%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.63%1.06%0.63%0.53%0.72%

Drawdowns

FLOT vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and FLRN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.50%-0.40%-0.30%-0.20%-0.10%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.06%
FLOT
FLRN

Volatility

FLOT vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison

iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) has a higher volatility of 0.41% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.30%. This indicates that FLOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.10%0.20%0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.41%
0.30%
FLOT
FLRN