FLOT vs. FLRN
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN).
FLOT and FLRN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). It was launched on Jun 14, 2011. FLRN is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). It was launched on Nov 30, 2011. Both FLOT and FLRN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLOT or FLRN.
Key characteristics
| FLOT | FLRN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.30% | 2.21% |
| 1Y Return | 7.13% | 7.02% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.41% | 3.40% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.67% | 2.65% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.01% | 2.04% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 7.09 | 5.59 |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.01% | 1.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.54% | -14.64% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOT and FLRN is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLOT vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLOT having a 2.30% return and FLRN slightly lower at 2.21%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLOT having a 2.01% annualized return and FLRN not far ahead at 2.04%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLOT vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLOT vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLOT vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison
FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, which matches FLRN's 5.77% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 5.82% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.46% | 0.97% | 0.53% | 0.44% | 0.47% |
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 5.77% | 5.68% | 1.95% | 0.39% | 1.22% | 2.76% | 2.39% | 1.64% | 1.06% | 0.63% | 0.53% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
FLOT vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and FLRN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLOT vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) is 0.13%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) has a volatility of 0.17%. This indicates that FLOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.