PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBCC vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBCC vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCC) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VBCC

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VUG

1D
-3.62%
1M
0.03%
YTD
5.80%
6M
4.57%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
24.49%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
17.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCC vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VBCC and VUG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBCC vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBCC

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBCC vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCC) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VBCC vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBCCVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.05

0.61

+1.44

Drawdowns

VBCC vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCC drawdown since its inception was -0.79%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCC and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCCVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-50.68%

+49.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-4.83%

+4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-7.09%

+6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.72%

Volatility

VBCC vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCCVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21%

16.26%

-14.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.21%

22.27%

-20.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.21%

21.47%

-19.26%

VBCC vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBCC vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VBCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBCC
Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBCC and VUG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCC.

VBCC has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.

VBCC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VBCC tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCC and 0.03% for VUG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBCC and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer