PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, VB has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 11.38%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.84% annualized return.


VB

1D
0.75%
1M
3.68%
YTD
14.91%
6M
16.03%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
11.38%

VT

1D
0.47%
1M
5.22%
YTD
13.23%
6M
14.61%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.91%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
13.23%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and VT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.87

The correlation between VB and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
VT

Industrials

20.8%
12.0%

Technology

17.2%
27.8%

Financial Services

12.6%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
9.5%

Healthcare

11.1%
8.1%

Real Estate

7.6%
2.4%

Basic Materials

4.8%
4.2%

Energy

4.7%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.8%

Utilities

3.3%
2.7%

Communication Services

3.1%
8.3%

Industrials

VB
20.8%
VT
12.0%

Technology

VB
17.2%
VT
27.8%

Financial Services

VB
12.6%
VT
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.3%
VT
9.5%

Healthcare

VB
11.1%
VT
8.1%

Real Estate

VB
7.6%
VT
2.4%

Basic Materials

VB
4.8%
VT
4.2%

Energy

VB
4.7%
VT
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.4%
VT
4.8%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
VT
2.7%

Communication Services

VB
3.1%
VT
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

2.44

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

3.36

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.44

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.27

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.82

14.59

-1.76

VB vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.44

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.71

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.75

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.44

0.00

Drawdowns

VB vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-50.27%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-9.67%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-16.51%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-26.38%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-34.24%

-7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-7.02%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.17%

+0.26%

Volatility

VB vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.75%. This indicates that VB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

3.75%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

10.13%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

12.67%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

16.04%

+4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

17.23%

+4.20%

VB vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than VT's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.58%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and VT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to VT (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.84% vs 11.38% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.19% for VB.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VT is Global Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer