PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. VSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. VSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than VSMAX's 14.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 11.38% annualized return and VSMAX not far behind at 11.28%.


VB

1D
0.75%
1M
3.68%
YTD
14.91%
6M
16.03%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
11.38%

VSMAX

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.89%
YTD
14.03%
6M
15.16%
1Y
30.33%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. VSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.91%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
VSMAX
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares
14.03%8.83%14.23%18.17%-17.61%17.74%19.06%27.36%-9.33%16.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and VSMAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.99

The correlation between VB and VSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. VSMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
VSMAX

Industrials

20.8%
20.8%

Technology

17.2%
17.2%

Financial Services

12.6%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
11.3%

Healthcare

11.1%
11.1%

Real Estate

7.6%
7.6%

Basic Materials

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

4.7%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.4%

Utilities

3.3%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.1%

Industrials

VB
20.8%
VSMAX
20.8%

Technology

VB
17.2%
VSMAX
17.2%

Financial Services

VB
12.6%
VSMAX
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.3%
VSMAX
11.3%

Healthcare

VB
11.1%
VSMAX
11.1%

Real Estate

VB
7.6%
VSMAX
7.6%

Basic Materials

VB
4.8%
VSMAX
4.8%

Energy

VB
4.7%
VSMAX
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.4%
VSMAX
3.4%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
VSMAX
3.3%

Communication Services

VB
3.1%
VSMAX
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. VSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMAX
VSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. VSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBVSMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.86

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.66

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.31

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.82

12.26

+0.57

VB vs. VSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the VSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and VSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBVSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.86

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.34

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.52

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.39

+0.05

Drawdowns

VB vs. VSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, roughly equal to the maximum VSMAX drawdown of -59.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and VSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBVSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-59.68%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-8.97%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-25.25%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-28.14%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-41.82%

-0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.32%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-9.70%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.43%

0.00%

Volatility

VB vs. VSMAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSMAX) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBVSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.35%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

11.71%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

16.29%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

20.71%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

21.56%

-0.13%

VB vs. VSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VB and VSMAX have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. VSMAX - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, which matches VSMAX's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VSMAX
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.56%1.54%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.49%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, VB and VSMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VB has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to VSMAX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs VSMAX's -59.68%.

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and VSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer