VB vs. SPSM
VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) and SPSM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - VB tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Index while SPSM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VB returned 11.70%/yr vs 11.47%/yr for SPSM. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VB charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPSM.
Performance
VB vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly lower than SPSM's 19.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 11.70% annualized return and SPSM not far behind at 11.47%.
VB
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
SPSM
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 19.33%
- 6M
- 16.91%
- 1Y
- 34.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
VB vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 14.80% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 19.33% | 6.11% | 8.55% | 16.11% | -16.12% | 26.67% | 11.69% | 25.85% | -11.17% | 15.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between VB and SPSM is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VB and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VB vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VB
SPSM
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
VB
SPSM
Technology
VB
SPSM
Financial Services
VB
SPSM
Healthcare
VB
SPSM
Consumer Cyclical
VB
SPSM
Real Estate
VB
SPSM
Basic Materials
VB
SPSM
Energy
VB
SPSM
Consumer Defensive
VB
SPSM
Utilities
VB
SPSM
Communication Services
VB
SPSM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VB vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank
VB
SPSM
VB vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VB | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 3.99 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | 13.45 | -1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VB vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than SPSM's maximum drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and SPSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VB | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.56% | -42.89% | -16.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -8.72% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.36% | -27.94% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.15% | -27.94% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.05% | -42.89% | +0.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -0.41% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -7.89% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.58% | -0.14% |
Volatility
VB vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) have volatilities of 4.99% and 4.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VB | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 4.93% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 12.04% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 17.65% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 21.42% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 22.99% | -1.57% |
VB vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VB vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison
VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than SPSM's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VB and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VB has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to SPSM (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs SPSM's -42.89%.
On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.70% vs 11.47% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VB.
SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.19% for VB.
VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.03% for SPSM.
SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VB and SPSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer