PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. SPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than SPSM's 23.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 11.04% annualized return and SPSM not far behind at 10.87%.


VB

1D
1.52%
1M
-0.23%
6M
11.01%
YTD
16.95%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
11.04%
ALL TIME*
9.95%

SPSM

1D
1.63%
1M
0.95%
6M
15.76%
YTD
23.56%
1Y
38.23%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
10.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$90.04M$96.96M$95.31M
$124.44M$120.08M$165.69M

VB vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
16.95%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
23.56%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%11.69%25.85%-11.17%15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and SPSM is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013

0.95

The correlation between VB and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
SPSM

Industrials

19.9%
15.6%

Technology

17.9%
15.5%

Healthcare

12.5%
12.4%

Financial Services

12.4%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
13.2%

Real Estate

7.9%
7.6%

Basic Materials

4.4%
4.7%

Energy

3.9%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.2%

Utilities

3.3%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.2%

Industrials

VB
19.9%
SPSM
15.6%

Technology

VB
17.9%
SPSM
15.5%

Healthcare

VB
12.5%
SPSM
12.4%

Financial Services

VB
12.4%
SPSM
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.6%
SPSM
13.2%

Real Estate

VB
7.9%
SPSM
7.6%

Basic Materials

VB
4.4%
SPSM
4.7%

Energy

VB
3.9%
SPSM
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.3%
SPSM
4.2%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
SPSM
1.8%

Communication Services

VB
2.9%
SPSM
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VB vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBSPSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

4.40

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.36

15.10

-3.74

VB vs. SPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the SPSM Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and SPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VB vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than SPSM's maximum drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and SPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBSPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-42.89%

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-8.72%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-27.94%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-27.94%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-42.89%

+0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.31%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-7.84%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.54%

-0.08%

Volatility

VB vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBSPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.75%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

11.70%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.44%

17.24%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.71%

21.29%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

22.95%

-1.57%

VB vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VB and SPSM have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than SPSM's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.37%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.20%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VB and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPSM has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to VB (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs SPSM's -42.89%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.04% vs 10.87% for SPSM. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.04% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB and SPSM have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.20% for VB.

VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street.

SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and SPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer