PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VB having a 15.33% return and SCHF slightly higher at 15.39%. Over the past 10 years, VB has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 11.61%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.


VB

1D
0.70%
1M
5.17%
YTD
15.33%
6M
13.69%
1Y
30.83%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
11.61%

SCHF

1D
0.29%
1M
3.90%
YTD
15.39%
6M
17.24%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.33%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.39%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and SCHF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.77

The correlation between VB and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
SCHF

Industrials

20.8%
18.1%

Technology

17.2%
17.6%

Financial Services

12.6%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
7.3%

Healthcare

11.1%
7.0%

Real Estate

7.6%
2.0%

Basic Materials

4.8%
7.4%

Energy

4.7%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
5.7%

Utilities

3.3%
3.2%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.6%

Industrials

VB
20.8%
SCHF
18.1%

Technology

VB
17.2%
SCHF
17.6%

Financial Services

VB
12.6%
SCHF
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.3%
SCHF
7.3%

Healthcare

VB
11.1%
SCHF
7.0%

Real Estate

VB
7.6%
SCHF
2.0%

Basic Materials

VB
4.8%
SCHF
7.4%

Energy

VB
4.7%
SCHF
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.4%
SCHF
5.7%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
SCHF
3.2%

Communication Services

VB
3.1%
SCHF
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

2.64

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

10.14

+1.66

VB vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VB vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-34.87%

-24.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-11.48%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-13.41%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-29.14%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-34.87%

-7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.00%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-7.37%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.99%

-0.55%

Volatility

VB vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 5.41%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

6.91%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

14.42%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

16.67%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

16.56%

+4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.44%

17.24%

+4.20%

VB vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than SCHF's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.18%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and SCHF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to VB (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.61% vs 10.82% for SCHF. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.18% for VB.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer