VB vs. SCHC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index, while SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VB returned 11.04%/yr vs 7.89%/yr for SCHC. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHC.

Performance

VB vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VB has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 11.04%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.89% annualized return.

VB

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: 11.01%
• YTD: 16.95%
• 1Y: 27.83%
• 3Y*: 15.29%
• 5Y*: 7.95%
• 10Y*: 11.04%
• ALL TIME*: 9.95%

SCHC

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 0.66%
• 6M: 0.47%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: 16.25%
• 5Y*: 5.89%
• 10Y*: 7.89%
• ALL TIME*: 7.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF	$14.61M	$16.76M	$17.34M
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	$124.44M	$120.08M	$165.69M

VB vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	16.95%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF	7.58%	37.59%	1.97%	14.36%	-21.74%	12.02%	10.48%	23.10%	-18.60%	29.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and SCHC is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010	0.76

The correlation between VB and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VB	SCHC
Industrials	19.9%	20.4%
Technology	17.9%	8.1%
Healthcare	12.5%	5.0%
Financial Services	12.4%	16.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	9.3%
Real Estate	7.9%	6.2%
Basic Materials	4.4%	13.3%
Energy	3.9%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	3.9%
Utilities	3.3%	2.8%
Communication Services	2.9%	2.6%

Return for Risk

VB vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 77
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SCHC

SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 45
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VB vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VB	SCHC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.19	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.71	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.22	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	1.58	+1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.36	4.88	+6.48

VB vs. SCHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the SCHC Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and SCHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VB vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and SCHC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VB	SCHC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.56%	-43.94%	-15.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.98%	-12.48%	+3.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.36%	-13.85%	-11.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.15%	-36.48%	+8.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.05%	-43.94%	+1.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-4.97%	+3.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.39%	-10.01%	+1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	4.03%	-1.57%

Volatility

VB vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 3.71%, while Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VB	SCHC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	4.86%	-1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.04%	14.28%	-2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.44%	16.61%	-0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.71%	17.66%	+3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.38%	17.83%	+3.55%

VB vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VB vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than SCHC's 3.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF	3.44%	3.66%	3.72%	2.94%	1.78%	3.02%	1.62%	3.23%	2.51%	2.73%	2.01%	2.34%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.20%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VB and SCHC in my portfolio?

VB and SCHC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VB or SCHC?

SCHC has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to VB (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs SCHC's -43.94%.

Which ETF is better, VB or SCHC?

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.04% vs 7.89% for SCHC. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VB or SCHC?

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.04% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VB or SCHC?

VB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for SCHC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VB or SCHC?

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.20% for VB.

What is the main difference between VB and SCHC?

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VB and 0.08% for SCHC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.