PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. IB01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly higher than IB01.L's 1.56% return.


VB

1D
0.70%
1M
5.90%
YTD
16.13%
6M
15.08%
1Y
31.74%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
11.68%

IB01.L

1D
0.03%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
16.13%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%8.77%
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.56%4.34%5.25%4.92%1.08%-0.85%0.88%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and IB01.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IB01.L
IB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
IB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBIB01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-34.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

7.99

-6.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

114.79

-111.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

574.12

-561.08

VB vs. IB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the IB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and IB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VB vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and IB01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBIB01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-1.28%

-58.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-0.03%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-0.09%

-25.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-1.15%

-27.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-0.24%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

0.01%

+2.43%

Volatility

VB vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 0.09%. This indicates that VB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBIB01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

0.09%

+5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

0.23%

+11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

0.33%

+16.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

0.54%

+20.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

0.79%

+20.66%

VB vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while IB01.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.17%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and IB01.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IB01.L.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.07% for IB01.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and IB01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer