PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IB01.L vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IB01.L vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IB01.L vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.86%4.34%5.25%4.92%0.10%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.96%4.37%5.16%5.04%0.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IB01.L achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 0.96% return.


IB01.L

1D
0.07%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*

BOXX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.96%
6M
2.05%
1Y
4.22%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IB01.L vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IB01.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IB01.L vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IB01.L
IB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
IB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
IB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IB01.L vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IB01.LBOXXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

11.48

12.86

-1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

30.08

36.75

-6.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

7.77

9.21

-1.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

47.46

61.54

-14.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

455.81

571.35

-115.54

IB01.L vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IB01.L Sharpe Ratio is 11.48, which is comparable to the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 12.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IB01.L and BOXX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IB01.LBOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48

12.86

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

8.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.73

12.97

-9.24

Correlation

The correlation between IB01.L and BOXX is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IB01.L vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither IB01.L nor BOXX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

IB01.L vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IB01.L drawdown since its inception was -0.91%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB01.L and BOXX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IB01.LBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-0.12%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.09%

-0.07%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.07%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.01%

0.00%

Volatility

IB01.L vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) is 0.11%, while Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) has a volatility of 0.15%. This indicates that IB01.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IB01.LBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

0.15%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.25%

0.25%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36%

0.33%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.37%

0.37%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.72%

0.37%

+0.35%