IB01.L vs. FLOA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L).
IB01.L and FLOA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IB01.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Feb 20, 2019. FLOA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. It was launched on Mar 20, 2018. Both IB01.L and FLOA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IB01.L or FLOA.L.
Key characteristics
| IB01.L | FLOA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.87% | 2.67% |
| 1Y Return | 5.25% | 6.99% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.61% | 3.58% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.02% | 2.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 14.72 | 8.18 |
| Daily Std Dev | 0.35% | 0.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.91% | -14.96% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IB01.L and FLOA.L is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IB01.L vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IB01.L achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than FLOA.L's 2.67% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IB01.L vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IB01.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IB01.L vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IB01.L vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IB01.L nor FLOA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IB01.L vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IB01.L drawdown since its inception was -0.91%, smaller than the maximum FLOA.L drawdown of -14.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB01.L and FLOA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IB01.L vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) is 0.11%, while iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) has a volatility of 0.26%. This indicates that IB01.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.