PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VB has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.61%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.52% annualized return.


VB

1D
0.70%
1M
3.26%
YTD
15.33%
6M
13.69%
1Y
30.83%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
11.61%

DGRO

1D
0.69%
1M
2.86%
YTD
9.86%
6M
9.27%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.33%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.86%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and DGRO is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.84

The correlation between VB and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
DGRO

Industrials

20.8%
10.4%

Technology

17.2%
22.0%

Financial Services

12.6%
20.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
5.4%

Healthcare

11.1%
16.5%

Real Estate

7.6%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%
2.4%

Energy

4.7%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
11.1%

Utilities

3.3%
6.4%

Communication Services

3.1%
0.1%

Industrials

VB
20.8%
DGRO
10.4%

Technology

VB
17.2%
DGRO
22.0%

Financial Services

VB
12.6%
DGRO
20.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.3%
DGRO
5.4%

Healthcare

VB
11.1%
DGRO
16.5%

Real Estate

VB
7.6%
DGRO

-

Basic Materials

VB
4.8%
DGRO
2.4%

Energy

VB
4.7%
DGRO
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.4%
DGRO
11.1%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
DGRO
6.4%

Communication Services

VB
3.1%
DGRO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.46

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

13.36

-1.56

VB vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VB vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-35.10%

-24.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-6.47%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-14.03%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-19.31%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-35.10%

-6.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-3.44%

-4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

1.68%

+0.76%

Volatility

VB vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.64%. This indicates that VB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

2.64%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

6.96%

+5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

9.59%

+7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

13.83%

+6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.44%

16.62%

+4.82%

VB vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than DGRO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.18%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and DGRO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.52% vs 11.61% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.18% for VB.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer