PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VB has outperformed CSB with an annualized return of 11.38%, while CSB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.


VB

1D
0.75%
1M
3.68%
YTD
14.91%
6M
16.03%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
11.38%

CSB

1D
0.91%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
9.49%
6M
10.26%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.91%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
9.49%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and CSB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.82

The correlation between VB and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
CSB

Industrials

20.8%
8.5%

Technology

17.2%
1.2%

Financial Services

12.6%
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
19.0%

Healthcare

11.1%
0.4%

Real Estate

7.6%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%
3.4%

Energy

4.7%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.4%

Utilities

3.3%
22.0%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.6%

Industrials

VB
20.8%
CSB
8.5%

Technology

VB
17.2%
CSB
1.2%

Financial Services

VB
12.6%
CSB
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.3%
CSB
19.0%

Healthcare

VB
11.1%
CSB
0.4%

Real Estate

VB
7.6%
CSB

-

Basic Materials

VB
4.8%
CSB
3.4%

Energy

VB
4.7%
CSB
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.4%
CSB
4.4%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
CSB
22.0%

Communication Services

VB
3.1%
CSB
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBCSBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.46

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.22

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.81

+0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.82

8.15

+4.68

VB vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBCSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.46

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.21

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.46

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.45

-0.01

Drawdowns

VB vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than CSB's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-42.07%

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-7.18%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-21.82%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-24.49%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-42.07%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.05%

+2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-7.14%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.47%

-0.04%

Volatility

VB vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.62%. This indicates that VB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

3.62%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

9.12%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

14.52%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

18.78%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

21.31%

+0.12%

VB vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VB vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than CSB's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.23%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and CSB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to CSB (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.38% vs 9.70% for CSB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSB.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.19% for VB.

VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.35% for CSB.

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer